Fashion babies, in the latest fashion

Fashion babies, in the latest fashion

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

The financial crisis is on everyone's lips. While thousands of children are starving in many parts of the world, there are others who are victims of eccentric cravings and fashion from his parents.

Of course the world of fashion and luxury is not in crisis. In Paris, the most chic they are not closed, and they increase their turnover. Months ago, the newspaper The Times published, in its edition on the Net, a list of the most stupidly expensive gifts for babies. These are common objects, but design, of the most distinguished and sought-after firms in the world. A luxurious version of baby items. If you are one of those who, like me, premiums for the quality-price balance when buying something for your child and you are against wasting so much money on something that you can get for much less, you may feel offended or think that you have always been in crisis.

1- Silver Cross Balmoral trolley: 1,255 euros

2- Armani pacifier: 31 euros

3- Bunny and Butterfly chandelier: 648 euros

4- Elegant booties or moccasins: 123 euros

5- Kit of cup and silver cutlery, by Tiffany: 448 euros Having seen what we have seen, many will wonder about what these babies eat, what toys they distract themselves with, and what they learn. After what I've heard about actress Sharon Stone applying Botox to her son's foot to remove the bad smell, nothing surprises me.Vilma Medina. Editor of our site

You can read more articles similar to Fashion babies, in the latest fashion, in the category of Gifts on site.

Video: 100 Years of Baby Fashion. Glamour (May 2022).


  1. Hurst

    I cannot take part in the discussion now - no free time. I would like to be free - to secure their point of view.

  2. Tityus

    it was interesting to read you, thanks and good luck!

  3. Kono

    You are not right. Enter we'll discuss.

  4. Sheldon

    Thank you, the post is truly sensible and to the point, there is something to learn.

  5. Lawe

    a No bad question

  6. Ares

    We are sorry, but it could give you more information.

  7. Barram

    An appeal against this.

Write a message